Scenario: You've a writer & musician w/ 10 yrs of customer service, 1 yr public radio; ran PR for & hosted 2 local events recently; helped facilitate 1 fundraiser online this month. You're moving to London UK next month. Fastest way to find paid PR work?
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
How much TV do you usually watch in a day?
The last time I even owned a TV, the Unabomber was still running around loose in Montana.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
The #Futrchat Daily
Earlier today, the Association of Professional Futurists (APF) conducted its fourth Twitter roundtable, #Futrchat, on the subject of transportation. Follow the link to paper.li for an aggregated digest of the discussion.
(Although I don't claim to have contributed to the discussion - I generally prefer to lurk and ruminate - the results are definitely worth sharing.)
(Although I don't claim to have contributed to the discussion - I generally prefer to lurk and ruminate - the results are definitely worth sharing.)
Saturday, January 15, 2011
If you could change anything about your neighborhood, what would it be?
There would be a corner grocery - the kind that has fresh produce - on every other block. In suburbia, this is no small feat.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
What's your favorite video game?
Tetris. Not only do I find my compulsive enjoyment of its simple form (as video games go) fascinating, but studies show that it makes a good warm blanket for post-traumatic, psychological shock. Isn't that a comforting thought?
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Educational Reform in America: The Trouble With Numbers
A recent post at The 21st Century Principal blog, "Can US Learn Ed Reform from Finland?", by J. Robinson*, posits that, "[American] education reformers dismiss all of what Finland does because 'that country lacks diversity...'" While I agree with many of Robinson's subsequent points, this particular assertion requires clarification.
Diversity is a valid and relevant discrepancy in any comparison of the U.S. teaching system to the Finnish education system. Having a national population of approximately 5.3 million (http://bit.ly/ggWbZw,) there are only as many Finns in all of Finland as there are citizens in the state of Missouri (http://bit.ly/hO9DUZ,) and Helsinki, the largest of Finland's cities, has a mere 588,000 residents (http://bit.ly/dEQ9WN.)
Even if it were equivalent to the United States in ethnic or class diversity (and it isn't,) the urban population of Helsinki alone contains a staggering 11 percent of the entire country's inhabitants; whereas the largest American urban center, New York City, contains only two percent of all Americans (http://bit.ly/gKbmvx.) When this number is combined with the 8 other U.S. cities of one million or more inhabitants, the sum total still amounts to only 7 percent of the American population (http://bit.ly/gn2T6X.) On this basis alone, it should be clear that the Finnish system has had a distinct advantage towards the facilitation of a streamlined methodology that the U.S. would never be able to match.
This is not to say that every idea or model for systemic change should be dismissed as futile, only that its implementation will always pose a significant challenge to any established institution: the more an infrastructure expands, the less effective it is likely to be.
(Maria H. Andersen's article, "The World Is My School: Welcome to the Era of Personalized Learning," at the World Future Society's website, addresses this paradox from a different perspective, outside the box, as it were. Worthwhile reading.)
*Robinson's post, in turn, relates an argument by Pasi Sahlberg from an Op-Ed in the Boston Globe.
Diversity is a valid and relevant discrepancy in any comparison of the U.S. teaching system to the Finnish education system. Having a national population of approximately 5.3 million (http://bit.ly/ggWbZw,) there are only as many Finns in all of Finland as there are citizens in the state of Missouri (http://bit.ly/hO9DUZ,) and Helsinki, the largest of Finland's cities, has a mere 588,000 residents (http://bit.ly/dEQ9WN.)
Even if it were equivalent to the United States in ethnic or class diversity (and it isn't,) the urban population of Helsinki alone contains a staggering 11 percent of the entire country's inhabitants; whereas the largest American urban center, New York City, contains only two percent of all Americans (http://bit.ly/gKbmvx.) When this number is combined with the 8 other U.S. cities of one million or more inhabitants, the sum total still amounts to only 7 percent of the American population (http://bit.ly/gn2T6X.) On this basis alone, it should be clear that the Finnish system has had a distinct advantage towards the facilitation of a streamlined methodology that the U.S. would never be able to match.
This is not to say that every idea or model for systemic change should be dismissed as futile, only that its implementation will always pose a significant challenge to any established institution: the more an infrastructure expands, the less effective it is likely to be.
(Maria H. Andersen's article, "The World Is My School: Welcome to the Era of Personalized Learning," at the World Future Society's website, addresses this paradox from a different perspective, outside the box, as it were. Worthwhile reading.)
*Robinson's post, in turn, relates an argument by Pasi Sahlberg from an Op-Ed in the Boston Globe.
Labels:
education,
learning,
population,
standards,
statistics
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Carpe noctem?
I suppose I'm overdue for an update; I will be doing that soon, however, now is not the time. Too tired, must sleep!
Labels:
update
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
